
THIS MONTH'S FEATURED SHOPPING CATEGORY IS LINGERIE:
Our Featured Lingerie Advertiser Is
Henry & June Lingerie Your private lingerie store...We offer outstanding service (Bizrate Gold), secure shopping (MasterCard Shop Smart), privacy (TrustE) and an unconditional guarantee. Why not play "dress-up" this weekend?
LINGERIE RANGES:
Baby Dolls, Chemises
Bras, Bustiers, Corsets
Hosiery, Garter Belts
Panties
Skirts, Pants
Teddies, Bodysuits
Women's Plus
BRANDS INCLUDE:
Allure Leather
BodyZone
Coquette
Dreamgirl
Dreamgirl Diamond
Dreamguy
Elegant Moments
Ellie Shoes
Exposed
Fantasy Lingerie
GYz
H.O.T.
Inner Vibe
Intimate Attitudes
Leg Avenue
Magic Silk
Pleaser
Risqué
Shirley of Hollywood
Teensy Weensy
Temporary Tattoo Factory
Zakk
CLUB/DANCE
Jumpsuits
Tops with Panties
ACCESSORIES
Boas
Chokers
Garters
Gloves
Vibrators
Whips
Wigs
Click Here For Henry & June Lingerie
|
Date published: 01.09.08 - not release date
Court victory strikes a blow for ex-spouses in family home
PRESS INFORMATION - media enquiries to Sam Dabbs - 07711 672893
A Court of Appeal decision has upheld the rights of ex-spouses to keep property they have been granted in the divorce settlement even though their former partners have since been made bankrupt, says law firm DWF.
The decision relates to the case of David and Wendy Haines, a married couple who bought a farmhouse in Dunhampton, Worcestershire in 2002. They later separated and in 2004 Mr Haines was ordered to transfer his share of the property to his wife as part of the divorce settlement. The following year he declared himself bankrupt.
The trustees administering the bankruptcy case applied to the courts to have Mr Haines’ share of the farmhouse returned to help pay off his debts. This was in line with insolvency rules which allow property transferred to another person before the bankruptcy to be clawed back up to five years later if it could be shown that the transaction was at an undervalue.
Although a district judge initially turned down the trustees request, the High Court agreed with the trustees. Now the Court of Appeal has backed the decision of the original judge and ruled that Mrs Haines can keep the property.
Michelle Ashworth, solicitor with DWF says: “The Court of Appeal felt the High Court judge had misunderstood the matrimonial case law. When a spouse agrees to a divorce settlement or an order is made after a contested hearing they give up the right to any future financial claims (capital). It would not be fair for them to lose their home at a later stage because their ex-spouse had been declared bankrupt. It would also be alien to the concept of a clean break if ahusband’s creditors could come and take the wife’s property away.
“The transfer of property, normally the family home, is one of the most common orders in divorce settlements. This decision is good news for 1000's of divorced people who are living in the matrimonial home and will ensure greater financial security for them and their children.”
Notes to editors:
DWF LLP is one of the fastest growing regional law firms in the UK. With over 850 people based in Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool and Preston, DWF provides a range of services grouped under the following practice areas:
Corporate
Banking & Finance
Business Recovery
Litigation
Real Estate
People
Insurance
Private Client
DWF has developed extensive sector-specific expertise in a number of areas including: automotive, education, retail & leisure, legal expenses and food and resourcing. Further information on DWF is available via www.dwf.co.uk
Media enquiries to:
Sam Dabbs
Dabbs PR & Marketing
Phone: 01939 210503 or 07711 672893
E: sam@dabbsprm.com
|
|